<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Local Search Topics &#124; TMP Directional Marketing &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchperspective.com/topics/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchperspective.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s &#8220;Government Requests&#8221; Tool Amid Larger Digital Debates</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2010/04/26/googles-government-requests-tool-amid-larger-digital-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2010/04/26/googles-government-requests-tool-amid-larger-digital-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/?p=3294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet is one of the world’s most widely used outlets for free expression.  Perhaps this is why Google announced their new government censorship tool, launched Tuesday. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2010/04/26/googles-government-requests-tool-amid-larger-digital-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Thief Faces First Ever Criminal Prosecution</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/08/14/domain-thief-faces-first-ever-criminal-prosecution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/08/14/domain-thief-faces-first-ever-criminal-prosecution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A law firm computer technician has been arrested in the first ever criminal case for domain name theft.  Daniel Goncalves was arrested on July 30th for hacking into a domain investor&#8217;s lawyer&#8217;s email account and transferring domain ownership of the URL www.p2p.com to his Go Daddy account.  This marks the first time anyone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/08/14/domain-thief-faces-first-ever-criminal-prosecution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Gags Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/06/02/china-gags-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/06/02/china-gags-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China has recently blocked access to several social websites in an effort to preemptively strike against perceived opportunities to congregate and collaborate on the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square riots.  The anniversary is on June 4th and Chinese authorities have cut access to sites like Twitter, Flickr, Live, Bing (just came out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/06/02/china-gags-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Testifies to Congress on “The Future of Journalism”</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/05/11/google-testifies-to-congress-on-the-future-of-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/05/11/google-testifies-to-congress-on-the-future-of-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently testified in front of Congress after being attacked by the The Associated Press over profiting off of work done by members of The Associated Press. Google’s goal was to convince the Senate that they are valuable to journalism, too.

Forbes.com CEO Jim Spanfeller claims that Google makes about $60 million per year off of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/05/11/google-testifies-to-congress-on-the-future-of-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Spend for Tax Prep Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/04/28/advertising-spend-for-tax-prep-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/04/28/advertising-spend-for-tax-prep-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherri Albus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxes have proven to be a big business in the United States, and not just for the state and federal government. According to Nielsen, tax services companies spent a total of $220 million on advertising in 2008, 11% more than the advertising spent in 2007.

Out of the total advertising dollars spent by tax companies, 78% [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2009/04/28/advertising-spend-for-tax-prep-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Walking a Thin Line</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/12/04/google-monopoly-walking-a-thin-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/12/04/google-monopoly-walking-a-thin-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/government/google-monopoly-walking-a-thin-line/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech Crunch is reporting today that Google was just three hours away from having an antitrust lawsuit filed against them by the Justice Department, an action sparked by the proposed Google and Yahoo search advertising deal.  Sanford “Sandy” Litvack, who would have been the lead counsel for the government had the lawsuit been carried [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/12/04/google-monopoly-walking-a-thin-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future Of Mobile Could Be In FCC&#8217;s Hands</title>
		<link>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/10/24/future-of-mobile-could-be-in-fccs-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/10/24/future-of-mobile-could-be-in-fccs-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchperspective.com/government/future-of-mobile-could-be-in-fccs-hands/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This coming November 4th, America will be voting on its future.  This future not only lies with the 2008 Presidential election, but also with the FCC’s upcoming vote on the rules of the “white spaces&#8221; spectrum.  
White spaces are unused portions of broadcast TV’s spectrum that serve to limit the interference between television [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchperspective.com/2008/10/24/future-of-mobile-could-be-in-fccs-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
